well, i was thinking since create a park allows scaffolding, the judges can be there to watch.
if the parks a big collabo things that'd be sick, and since there's assets, the logo can be a mix of people gc's
the idea would be everyone do they're runs. the judges split around the course. or everyone judge different sections or something.
have a good filmer too.
itd prolly be better to make the course then have whoever is in it to post there run/runs instead of a person trying to watch them do it. i unno...just a thought. i do like the idea of judges watching everything go down but it doesnt always work out.
yeah, probably would work better considering timezones and stuff. but it'll be judged on consistency, style and best tricks. first try stuff, so if everyone was assigned a time that worked with the judges and the participants. or a filmer to make sure it's not sometime spending hours trying that line and stuff.
So down for this
a second fluckit park?
whaaa?
I like this idea alot.
As blackhawk pointed out it would be pretty hard for anyone to judge, so I'd say skip the idea of consistency altogether.
Here's how I'd like to see it go down:
A select few members design the park (could be a fuzz if everyone wanted in)
Once the course is done, set a deadline for the contest and anyone that wants to participate makes a video in the park.
Deadline could be tight, like a week, which would somewhat create a level of consistency after all.
Also I think a good idea would be the creators of the park to judge the videos...
These are merely my thoughts on it, what do you think?
Originally Posted by Clayfighter
this would be ill
like a s3 maloof
DONTO KOI
this
yea i agree with knex. having the creators judge the videos. and a really short deadline.
definitely great ideas.
This sounds like a good idea.
My two cents:
One person creates the park, they are the judge/creator. They make their park unavailable for download.
The judge/creator invites 4 contestants to sesh the park online at a predetermined time.
Without getting too much of a chance to examine the park, the judge starts the contest. The four contestants sesh the park for exactly an hour.
As the contestants get tricks, they just quickly save their replays for later. They are encouraged to get tricks on different obstacles of the course. After the hour expires, the judge ends the contest and kicks everyone out of the session.
Then, the contestants go back and review all of their saved replays. They choose their best 5 tricks (or maybe best 60 seconds) to film and upload as their entry.
Then they can be judged by the community, the judge, or a set group of judges based on the clips they post.
If it's done this way, you have...
consistency: The contestants only have an hour to get their tricks, you gotta be consistent.
creativity: With no way to practice at the course before hand, the contestants have to spontaneously find creative ways to use the obstacles.
difficulty: Obviously the difficulty of the tricks.
filming: After the hour is over, people can go back and take their time getting angles and what not. This way the time spend getting tricks doesn't overlap with the time spend filming.
seems like this way would please everyone. The it wouldn't take too long to run a contest, so skate.create people can host them fairly often. Difficulty people can prove their consistency by the tricks they can get in an hour. Filming people can take their time getting the shots they want afterwards.
How does this format sound?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote