fuck yeeahaahahahahahaha
fuck yeeahaahahahahahaha
WOOOO super stoked on edited other peoples parks
Design by commitee won't really work (never does) for many reasons...
firstly because if you pass you're section around, where are you going to put it in relation to the other pieces in the park, this will affect the overall flow..
there will be a limit to the amount of objects we can put in, so half way through we might run out of memory, what then? does the next person start editing other peoples stuff taking things out or rearranging stuff...
There are also design issues to contend with e.g...if there was a 15 stair rail setup with big steps, this might be only possible with 15 individual flat scaled pieces if it's to mirror a real spot, or we might have to make do with three 5 stair pieces from the terrain dropper, this again depends on the amount of memory we have left...
There is also the need for elevated sections, where do these go??
what happens if 2 or 3 people have the same kind of section setup?
What happens if you're ill or your xbox breaks?? I have 2 360's so for me that's not a problem...
The only way this will work is that everyone makes their piece as a single setup park, then these are all collected and then translated into the said park..
It would be quite easy for me to set up a park and drop the sections into it in 3DMAX which we can then have a look at and comment/discuss before we do it ingame...
taken from wikipedia..
Design by committee is a term referring to a style of design and its resultant output when a group of entities comes together to produce something (often the design of technological systems or standards), particularly in the presence of poor and incompetent leadership. The defining characteristics of "design by committee" are needless complexity, internal inconsistency, logical flaws, banality, and the lack of a unifying vision.
The term is especially common in technical parlance, and it legitimizes the need and general acceptance of a unique systems architect. Often, when software is designed by a committee, the original motivation, specifications and technical criteria take a backseat and poor choices may be made merely to appease the egos of several individual committee members. Such products and standards end up doing too many things or having parts that fit together poorly (because the entities who produced those parts were unaware of each other's requirements for a good fit).
yeah yeah SMART GUY!....
i mean...
make a obstacles....
take a pic of your tv so we can see the amount of file size is being used....
save...
swap....
nothings ever really gonna be perfect and lets face it...
the file max will be hit and will stay full as we adjust everything to fit for our pieces...
eventually well get a full file size with a decent representation of what each of us wanted...
and like all planning it will take time....
so be it...
i know we can pull of something amazing...
all i can think about it the video we put out after....
labeling spots...
destruction....
fly over cams....
can not wait to edit parks...
there in lies the problem demz...if we all adjust stuff to fit sections in then we're fucked...everyone will move things about, then we'll want to move things back how we had them ad infinitum..Originally Posted by Demzilla
no problem doing that if you want after the parks done and dusted so you can have your own variation
our own variation is def whats going to happen..
i was more leaning towards...
i can save file size if this pathway was 4 blocks wide instead of 6...
that kind of file management..
not really taking away from the spot..
just making it a solid a possible in order to save space...
i also think we will collectively come together to decide the order of how the park is arranged....
and like you said....
each persons park may be set up differently but its still full of obstacles that fluckit created...
yeah the flow maybe different but i think deep down we all just want to skate the same things regardless if its rearranged diff...
i see myself recreating the spots people make and adjusting them to fill the full file size....
and in the end hopefully having a good park....
of course if someone makes something crazy dope and i need a roll in IM GONNA BUST OUT THE ROLL IN....
to me this seems liek a great way of sharing created spots...
if there is a fluckit park and something doesnt fit it wil be adjusted right then and there..
easy...
you cant stop altering but you can stay close to the original idea...
random note...
watching people skate spots off of a idea ive uploaded will give me that same sense of satisfaction like the gc....
even if its diff....
like the gc i cant determine how you will put your 54 logo on your shirt...
as long as its there im happy...
haha nice... an "Introducing: Fluckit Park" video.
And strab i think with just a little organisation it can be pulled off.
I dont think anyone here is going to be complaining about anything anyway.
So stoked.
Jack
"Is that a baby carrot in your pocket are you just packing lunch for your vegetarian wife?"
yeah i feel that same way...
adjustments arent gonna hurt...
everybody here just wants to share...
and you know in the end if someones park has everything in it at a proportion a few like it might become the final set in stone park...
who knows....
i am slowly finding the cap re-editer to be as monumental as the gc all together....
these two aspects to me essentially never end the game for me....
new gear and spots and im done...
u know....after this park is created...were gnna have to do one big ass fluckit monty there
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote