With the loose style the default low tre's are just as low but look a million times better, surely?
With the loose style the default low tre's are just as low but look a million times better, surely?
if your not going to do the proper glitch then just use loose style. this looks beyond stupid
it's a matter of style, either you chose standard style and you want really low tre flips: then do this glitch or you wanna have low tre flips and you choose og or loose (for me standard looks best and I just wanted to show you what I found out, don't take it seroius, I know it's pretty worthless but I had fun doing this tut)
@knex: I already knew this trick by pawn but for me it looks not as good as my "trick"
if the front leg did the shimmmy i'd like it. But the back leg?
Props for experimenting, love it!
".........................................."
Helen Adams Keller
personally i have no interest in the standard or aggressive styles so this is a non issue for me. But i dig the experimenting like SG said. In combination with gestures and/or R1 who knows what kinda animations might be available...
or you could just do the proper glitch for aggressive tre's and not look like an idiot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yBuhywHjtE
I don't see a need to fix the ingame low tres, both options seem lame
if you had something to come back fakie from a handplant or not extend one all the way, or maybe even a better looking blunt. Never had a problem with the tres
".........................................."
Helen Adams Keller
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote